<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks you for your response. So I'll try to adapt my written from the last release, but I wonder from which one as patches go new every day.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">So can you commit a branch (or something) where I can start from, it would be a great help.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks. Thipadin.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Ashley Pittman <ashley@pittman.co.uk></b></font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">10/30/2009 07:26 PM</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Pour : thipadin.seng-long@bull.net</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc : padb-devel@pittman.org.uk, florence.vallee@bull.net, francois.wellenreiter@bull.net, Sylvain.JEAUGEY@bull.net</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Objet : Re: [padb-devel] Patch for Support of PBS Pro resource manager</font></table>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:06 +0100, thipadin.seng-long@bull.net wrote:<br>
> I'm a Bull software engineer and been working for a while on padb to<br>
> adapt it to PBS Pro environment. <br>
> The modified padb has been working fine in our MPI_Bull2 / Pbs Pro<br>
> environment. <br>
> So I am sending you the patch for you to integrate in the common padb<br>
> branch. <br>
> I have started from padb 2.5 version, sorry. <br>
> If you want to discuss about my coding I am ready, feel free to<br>
> comment before you commit it. <br>
> Many other resources managers (slurm-orte, lsf-mpd, lsf-orte) will<br>
> follow. <br>
<br>
First off that's great! I'm always keen to see padb better and<br>
available to a wider range of people.<br>
<br>
Secondly as you'll see if you look at the history I've done a lot of<br>
work since the 2.5 release so several aspects of the design are<br>
different. For the most part this should make things simpler to code<br>
for however it does mean changes to the code you have written.<br>
<br>
I'm happy to integrate patches which add new resource managers as the<br>
danger of breaking anything else is low, I'd like to see if we can get<br>
away without they lpbs_get_script_name() function though.<br>
<br>
Are you able to upgrade to the HEAD code and submit patches based on<br>
that? have a look at @inner_conf and in particular slurm_job_step for<br>
how to pass on $server and $port to the inner processes.<br>
<br>
Ashley,<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Ashley Pittman, Bath, UK.<br>
<br>
Padb - A parallel job inspection tool for cluster computing<br>
http://padb.pittman.org.uk<br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>