<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>On </b>2/03/2009 01:53 PM<b> Sylvain Jeaugey <sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net> </b>wrote:</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">> I don't understand why this combination is being discussed ?<br>
<br>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, thipadin.seng-long@bull.net wrote:<br>
> > salloc srun -n 1 mpirun -bynode -n 8 my_prog<br>
<br>
> The "srun -n 1" is useless and I doubt anyone would ever try to use it. Is <br>
> there a reason behind this ?</font>
<p>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">There is no reason behind this but Padb should support all kind of jobs.</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">"srun -n 1 mpirun" is equivalent to "mpirun ", I do admit.</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">But no one can prevent somebody to start jobs like this</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">since the syntax is correct,</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">So if some one start jobs like this, padb should be able to support.</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">That's the way to make padb rich. That's my point of view.</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">In term of source code there is just one line added by Ashley and it works.</font>
<p>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">Regards.</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Courier New">Thipadin. </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Sylvain Jeaugey <sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net></b></font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">12/03/2009 01:53 PM</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Pour : thipadin.seng-long@bull.net</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc : Ashley Pittman <ashley@pittman.co.uk>, florence.vallee@bull.net, francois.wellenreiter@bull.net, padb-devel@pittman.org.uk, Sylvain.JEAUGEY@bull.net</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Objet : Re: Réf. : Re: [padb] Patch of support of Slurm + Openmpi Orte manager</font></table>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Thipadin,<br>
<br>
I don't understand why this combination is being discussed ?<br>
<br>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, thipadin.seng-long@bull.net wrote:<br>
> salloc srun -n 1 mpirun -bynode -n 8 my_prog<br>
<br>
The "srun -n 1" is useless and I doubt anyone would ever try to use it. Is <br>
there a reason behind this ?<br>
<br>
Sylvain<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>