<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">On </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Mon, 21th dec 2009 at 13:04 +0100 </font><font size=2 face="Courier New"> ashley@pittman.co.uk wrote:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">>On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 14:37 +0100, thipadin.seng-long@bull.net wrote:<br>
<br>
>> I have a support request from Bull customer that would like to have <br>
>> padb report sorted by threads as below: <br>
<br>
>That's great.<br>
<br>
>> Would you accept it ? <br>
<br>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, I would gladly accept a patch<br>
> implementing it.<br>
<br>
> I don't have a huge amount of time to be working on padb right now and<br>
> there are already a large number of features waiting for a release as<br>
> well as people who've found they need to use the SVN version for some<br>
> individual machine.<br>
<br>
> My priority currently is to finish off what is absent, package padb<br>
> properly into a rpm, convert it to use antoconf and fix what bugs people<br>
> find in the mean time. Re: threads in stack traces I don't seem myself<br>
> having time to do anything other than the simple option of allowing<br>
> users to restrict which threads are shown for each invocation of padb<br>
> without it delaying the release.<br>
<br>
> Ashley,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Ok you are right, let's make a package padb out of all </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">features waiting for a release. I think it is a wise decision.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">As to me I will be off for 2 weeks, so I'll be working on threads sort </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">at the beginning of the year.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Thipadin.</font>
<br>